Copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide and homopolymerization of propylene oxide

ABSTRACT

Copolymers of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide and homopolymers of propylene oxide are made using two dimensional double metal cyanide complexes having the formula Co[M(CN) 4 ] or hydrated or partially dehydrated form thereof. There is no propylene carbonate by product in the copolymerization.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/839,682, filed Aug. 24, 2006, the whole of which is incorporated herein by reference.

This invention was made at least in part with U.S. Government support under NSF grant numbers CHE-0243605 and DMR-0079992. The Government has certain rights in the invention.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention is directed to homopolymerization of propylene oxide and copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide, using double metal cyanide catalysts.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Zinc hexacyanometalates have been used for epoxide/carbon dioxide copolymerization. A drawback to these catalysts is that undesired by-product propylene carbonate (requiring purification) is also formed unless such low temperatures are utilized that catalyst activity is significantly reduced.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It has been discovered herein that tetracyanometallate containing double metal cyanide complexes readily catalyzed the copolymerization of propylene oxide and carbon dioxide without the formation of propylene carbonate. These complexes are also functional to catalyze the homopolymerization of propylene oxide.

In one embodiment of the invention herein, denoted the first embodiment, the invention is directed to a method for the non-alternating copolymerization of rac-propylene oxide or enantomerically enriched propylene oxide and carbon dioxide to produce

where x ranges from 1.0 to 0.46 and M_(n) ranges from 500 to 500,000 g/mol, e.g. 10,000 to 500,000 g/mol. This method comprises the step of copolymerizing rac-propylene oxide or enantomerically enriched propylene oxide and carbon dioxide in the presence of a catalytically effective amount of a double metal cyanide complex containing a tetracyanometallate moiety, e.g., anhydrous Co[M(CN)₄] where M is selected from the group consisting of Ni, Pd and Pt and combinations thereof, or hydrated or partially dehydrated form thereof.

In another embodiment of the invention herein, denoted the second embodiment, the invention is directed to a method for the homopolymerization of rac-propylene oxide or enantomerically enriched propylene oxide, comprising the step of polymerizing rac-propylene oxide or enantomerically enriched propylene oxide in the presence of a catalytically effective amount of a double metal cyanide complex containing a tetracyanometallate moiety, e.g., anhydrous Co[M(CN)₄] where M is selected from the group consisting of Ni, Pd and Pt and combinations thereof, to produce poly(propylene oxide) having M_(n) ranging from 500 to 250,000 g/mol.

In another embodiment of the invention, denoted the third embodiment, the invention is directed to a method of preparing Co[M(CN)₄] comprising reacting cobalt salt, preferably Co(SO₄), and K₂[M(CN)₄] to form hydrated Co[M(CN)₄] and dehydrating the hydrated Co[M(CN)₄] to produce anhydrous Co[M(CN)₄] where M is selected from the group consisting of Ni, Pt and Pd.

In another embodiment herein, denoted the fourth embodiment, the invention is directed to the method of preparing anhydrous Co[M(CN)₄], where M is selected from the group consisting of Ni, Pt, and Pd, comprising the step of dehydrating microcrystalline Co(H₂O)₂[M(CN)₄].4H₂O. As used herein the term microcrystalline means having crystal dimensions less than 1.0 mm in the narrowest dimension.

In another embodiment herein, denoted the fifth embodiment, the invention is directed at Co[Pt(CN)₄].

In still another embodiment herein, denoted the sixth embodiment, the invention is directed at Co[Pd(CN)₄].

In still another embodiment, denoted the seventh embodiment, the invention is directed to a method for non-alternating copolymerization of

where R in (I) is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, C₂-C₁₈-alkyl, C₆-C₁₈-aryl, C₁-C₂₀ halide (e.g., F, I, Cl, Br) containing alkyl, and C₁-C₂₀ oxygen-containing alkyl, and

carbon dioxide (II),

comprising the step of copolymerizing (I) and (II) in the presence of a catalytically effective amount of double metal cyanide complex containing a tetracyanometallate moiety, to produce polyether-polycarbonate having the formula

where x ranges from 1.0 to 0.46 and M_(n) of (III) ranges from 500 to 500,000 g/mol, e.g., 10,000 to 500,000 g/mol.

In another embodiment herein, denoted the eighth embodiment, the invention is directed to a method for homopolymerization of

where R in (I) is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, C₂-C₁₈-alkyl, C₆-C₁₈-aryl, C ₁-C₂₀ halide (e.g., F, I, Cl, Br) containing alkyl, and C₁-C₂₀ oxygen-containing alkyl, comprising the step of polymerizing (I) in the presence of a double metal cyanide complex containing a tetracyanometallate moiety to produce poly(substituted ethylene oxide (I)) having the formula

where R is as defined above, and M_(n) ranges from 500 to 250,000 g/mol.

The term “tetracyanometallate moiety” is used herein to refer to metal surrounded by and bound to four cyanides where the metal is bound to the carbon atoms of the cyanide ligands.

The term “enantomerically enriched propylene oxide is used herein to mean propylene oxide where the ratio of enantiomers is not 50:50.

Alternating polymerization provides A-B-A-B-A-B-A-B, etc. where A represents propylene oxide unit (PO unit) and B a CO₂ unit, i.e., there are no adjacent propylene oxide units. In non-alternating polymerization, the product contains adjacent propylene oxide units.

In many cases there are more PC units than PO units. PO/CO₂ copolymers, with approximately 15% carbonate units are considered to be soluble in supercritical CO₂ apparently because of surfactant functionality. (Sarbu, J., et al., Nature 405, 165-168 (2000)).

As used herein M_(n), M_(w) and M_(w)/M_(n) (PDI) are determined by gel permeation chromatography calibrated with polystyrene standards in tetrahydrofuran at 40° C.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Elements of the invention and working examples are found in Robertson, N.J., et al., Dalton Trans., 2006, 5390-5395 and Electronic Supplementary Information, pages S1-S10, the whole of both of which are incorporated herein by reference.

We turn firstly to the catalyst.

The catalyst for the first embodiment has the formula Co[M(CN)₄] where M is selected from the group consisting of Ni, Pt and Pd and combinations thereof. For the first embodiment the catalyst can be in hydrated form, e.g., Co(H₂O)₂[M(CN)₄].4H₂O, partially dehydrated form, e.g., Co(H₂O)₂[M(CN)₄], or anhydrous form, i.e., Co[M(CN)₄].

The catalyst for the second embodiment has the formula Co[M(CN)₄] where M is selected from the group consisting of Ni, Pd and Pt and combinations thereof, in the anhydrous form, i.e., homopolymerization was obtained with the anhydrous form but not with the hydrated or partially dehydrated forms.

The catalysts are prepared by forming hydrated form using a modified procedure of that described in Niu, T., Crisci, G., Lu, T. and Jacobson, A. J., Acta Cryst., Sect. C, 54, 565-567 (1998), the whole of which is incorporated herein by reference. An aqueous solution of K₂[M(CN)₄] is reacted with aqueous solution of Co^(II)-based salt to produce Co(H₂O)₂[M(CN)₄].4H₂O. The use of Co(SO₄) was used in place of the Co(SCN)₂ used by Jacobson. It was found that the use of Co(SO₄) in this synthesis yields the Co[M(CN)₄] complexes with higher activities in the as made form, i.e., without extensive washing, that is higher than when the complexes were made utilizing other cobalt sources. For example, when Co(SCN)₂ is used, extensive washing is required to obtain the same activity as when Co(SO₄) is used without extensive washing, and when CoCl₂ is used, extensive washing is required to prevent chloride poisoning of the active catalyst. Vacuum filtering of reaction product yields hydrated catalyst. Drying in vacuo for a protractice time, e.g., overnight, gives anhydrous catalyst. Drying in vacuo for a short time, e.g., 1 hour, gives partially dehydrated catalyst.

The starting materials K₂[Ni(CN)₄], K₂[Pt(CN)₄] and K₂[Pd(CN)₄] are all commercially available.

Working Example I, hereinafter, is directed to preparation of Co(H₂O)₂[Ni(CN)₄].4H₂O and Co[Ni(CN)₄]. Working Example II, hereinafter, is directed to synthesis of Co[Pt(CN)₄] and Co[Pd(CN)₄].

We turn now to reaction conditions for the first embodiment besides the description of the catalyst.

The mole ratio of propylene oxide charged to catalyst charged PO:Co mole ratio basis, can range, for example, from 100:1 to 100,000:1, e.g., 100:1 to 5000:1, e.g., 500:1 to 2000:1.

The carbon dioxide pressure can range, for example, from ambient pressure (e.g., 1 atmosphere) to 1500 psig. When the carbon dioxide pressure is greater than 1 atmosphere, e.g., is 800 psig, the pressure defines the amount of carbon dioxide. When the carbon dioxide pressure is ambient, the amount of carbon dioxide is provided by the headspace in the reactor, e.g., 200 to 1000 ml. When the pressure is increased, the amount of carbonate units increases but catalyst activity decreases,

The copolymerization can be carried out neat (without other solvent, i.e., the liquid propylene oxide acts as the reaction medium) or in hydrocarbon solvent, e.g., toluene or xylene.

In runs carried out, copolymerizations were carried out neat and in toluene.

The temperature at which the copolymerization is carried out, can range, for example from 10° C. to 150° C., e.g., 25 to 135° C. Catalyst activity increases with increasing temperature. Longer reaction time can accommodate for lower temperature.

Reaction times range, for example, from 15 minutes to 5 days, e.g. 30 minutes to 30 hours.

A representative copolymerization procedure is as follows: A 100 mL Parr autoclave equipped with a mechanical stirrer is dried under vacuum at 80° C. for 2 h and then transferred to a drybox to cool to 22° C. Co[Ni(CN)₄] (10.0 mg, 0.0450 mmol) is put into a glass sleeve in the autoclave. Toluene (8.0 mL) and PO (8.0 mL, 0.11 mol) were added under nitrogen via an injection port. The autoclave is pressurized to 34.0 atm and then heated to 90° C. over 20 min. During this time the pressure increases to the desired 54.4 atm. If the CO₂ pressure is lower than desired once heating is complete, additional CO₂ is added to reach the desired pressure. The total reaction time from initial pressurizing is 1 h. The autoclave is cooled and vented to yield a large polymer mass, which was dissolved in CHCl₃ to ensure the same was homogeneous before taking an aliquot for ¹H NMR analysis. The solvent is removed by rotary evaporation and the resulting polymer is dried in vacuo at 50° C. to a constant weight to determine polymer yield (4.77 g, 60%). The resulting polymer is dissolved in toluene and treated with 10% aqueous NH₄OH (20 mL) to remove the catalyst and then dried in vacua to a constant mass.

Working examples of copolymerization are given in Working Examples III-XVI hereinafter.

In all cases the copolymers formed are regioregular and atactic as determined by ¹³C{¹H}NMR spectroscopy and are amorphous.

M_(n) can range, for example, from 500 to 500,000 g/mol, e.g., 10,000 to 500,000 g/mol or 15,000 to 250,000 g/mol, with M_(w)/M_(n) (PDI) ranging, for example, from 1.9 to 5.8, usually about 2.0 to 4.0. The M_(n) can be reduced by an order of magnitude, e.g., to 500 to 25,000 or 5,000 g/mole, by addition of chain transfer agent (CTA), e.g., alcohol, e.g., methanol, glycerol or polyhydroxy compound such as PG425 polyol (which is polypropylene glycol of molecular weight of 425 g/mol, or carboxylic acid, e.g., acetic acid., into the reaction mixture, e.g., in an amount of 1 to 500 equivalents of CTA versus Co(Ni(CN)₄]. No propylene carbonate formation was observed in ¹H NMR spectroscopic analysis in any of the runs carried out.

We turn now to the second embodiment.

The catalyst and its preparation is described above.

The mole ratio of propylene oxide charged to catalyst charged, can range, for example, from 100:1 to 5000:1. Working examples were carried out at 2530:1 PO:Co mole ratio.

The polymerization is readily carried out at ambient pressure.

The reaction can be carried out neat (i.e., without other solvent and the liquid propylene oxide acts as the reaction medium) or in the solvents described for the first embodiment.

Temperatures at which homopolymerization can be carried out range, for example, from 10° C. to 150° C., e.g. 50-100° C.

Times at which the homopolymerization is carried out, ranges, for example, from 15 minutes to 5 days, e.g. 30 minutes to 24 hours.

Working Example XVII is directed to the homopolymerization reaction.

The homopolymers formed have M_(n) ranging from 500 to 500,000 g/mol, e.g., 10,000 to 500,000 g/mol or e.g., about 40,000 to 200,000 g/mol, with PDI ranging from 1.5 to 5, e.g., 1.9 to 2.5. The M_(n) can be reduced by an order of magnitude, e.g., to 500 to 25,000 or 5,000 g/mole, by addition of chain transfer agent, e.g., those mentioned as CTAs above, into the reaction mixture, e.g., in an amount of 1 to 500 equivalents of CTA versus Co(Ni(CN)₄].

The homopolymers formed are regioregular and atactic and are amorphous.

The copolymers and homopolymers made herein are useful for polyurethane synthesis and the polyurethanes are useful as materials for forming foam cushions.

We turn now to the third embodiment.

As indicated above, the use of Co(SO₄) as the cobalt salt results in as made catalyst with much higher activity than when other cobalt salts, e.g., CoCl₂ or Co(SCN)₂ are used. Catalysts made with other salts require extensive washing, e.g., multiple washings of the complex on filter paper with water, for the same activity. The higher activity is manifested by amount of polymer formed per amount of catalyst being higher in a given amount of time.

We turn now to the fourth embodiment.

Microcrystalline hydrated catalyst is better as a starting compound for dehydration because it has a higher surface area than larger crystalline hydrated catalyst.

We turn now to the fifth embodiment.

Co[Pt(CN)₄] can be prepared as described above starting with K₂[Pt(CN)₄] which is commercially available.

We turn now to the sixth embodiment.

Co[Pd(CN)₄] can be prepared as described above starting with K₂[Pd(CN)₄] which is commercially available. It catalyzes more CO₂ incorporation than does Co[Ni(CN)₄] at the same conditions.

We turn now to the seventh embodiment. A species of this is the method of the first embodiment.

We turn now to the eighth embodiment. A species of this is the method of the second embodiment.

The complex used as catalyst for the seventh and eighth embodiments is preferably Co[M(CN)₄], e.g., where M is Ni.

The invention is illustrated by the following working examples.

WORKING EXAMPLE I Preparation of Co[Ni(CN)₄]

The complex Co(H₂O)₂[Ni(CN)₄].4H₂O was prepared using a modified procedure of Niu et al., cited above, substituting CoSO₄ for Co(SCN)₂. With vigorous stirring, 10 mL of a 0.23 M aqueous K₂[Ni(CN)₄] solution and 10 mL of a 0.23 M aqueous CoSO₄ solution were mixed. A pink precipitate instantly formed, and an additional 10 mL of distilled water were added to reduce the viscosity of the suspension. The mixture was stirred vigorously for 1 h and then vacuum filtered to yield a pink microcrystalline material. The powder X-ray data of this complex matched the calculated data for Co(H₂O)₂Ni(CN)₄.4H₂O. The complex was dried in vacuo at 60° C. for 10 h yielding the deep purple solid Co[Ni(CN)₄] (0.42 g, 83%) that was subsequently ground into a powder with a mortar and pestle and then used in polymerizations. Thermogravimetric and elemental analyses revealed that >97% of the inter-layer water molecules were removed.

WORKING EXAMPLE II Preparation of Co[M(CN)₄] Where M=Pd or Pt

The analogous complexes Co[Pd(CN)₄] and Co[Pt(CN)₄] were prepared using the same procedure as used in Working Example I for Co[Ni(CN)₄]. In each case, with vigorous stirring 10 mL of a 0.23 M aqueous K₂[M(CN₄)] solution and 10 mL of a 0.23 M aqueous CoSO₄ solution were mixed and a pink precipitate instantly formed. In each case an additional 10 mL of distilled water was added, followed by vigorous stirring for 1 hour and vacuum filtering to recover product. Isolated yields were 89 and 84%, respectively. Thin pink-orange plates of Co(H₂O)₂[Pd(CN)₄].4H₂O for X-ray analysis were obtained by layering a solution of CoCl₂.6H₂O in ethanol onto a solution of K₂[Pd(CN)₄].3H₂O in water and storing in a sealed test-tube at 22° C. for a period of two weeks.

WORKING EXAMPLE III Copolymerization Using Co[Ni(CN₄)]

The representative copolymerization procedure described above was varied as necessary to provide the conditions following. The catalyst was anhydrous Co[Ni(CN)₄]. Copolymerization was carried out for 1 hr with 16 mL of 7.1 M rac-PO in toluene, [PO]/[Co]=2530. Initial CO₂ pressure was 34 atm. The autoclave was heated to 130° C. The CO₂ pressure increased to 54.4 atm. Copolymer yield on drying in vacuo at 50° C. for 8 hours was 5.57 g. The carbonate fraction determined by ¹H NMR spectroscopy (CDCl₃, 300 MHz) referenced versus non-deuterated solvent shifts (¹H, CHCl₃, δ 7.25) f_(co2) was 0.20. The propylene oxide conversion (equal to polymer mass/(0.114 mol PO)[102x_(fco2)+(58x(1-_(fco2))] was 73%. The turnover frequency, i.e. TOF, was 1860 where TOF equals (mole PO)·(mole Co)⁻¹·h⁻¹. M_(n) was 74,300 g/mol. M_(w)/M_(n) was 3.1. No propylene carbonate was observed.

WORKING EXAMPLE IV Copolymerization Using Co[Ni(CN₄)]

The procedure used in Working Example III was followed except the temperature of reaction was 110° C. Copolymer yield was 5.39 g. The f_(co2) was 0.22. The conversion of PO was 70%. TOF was 1770. M_(n) was 84,100 g/mol. M_(w)/M_(n) was 2.9. No propylene carbonate was observed.

WORKING EXAMPLE V Copolymerization Using Co[Ni(CN)₄]

The procedure used in Working Example III was followed except that the temperature of reaction was 90° C. Copolymer yield was 4.77 g. The f_(co2) was 0.27. The conversion of PO was 60%. TOF was 1510. M_(n) was 86,000 g/mol. M_(w)/M_(n) was 2.8. No propylene carbonate was observed.

In another case reaction was carried out as above except that the reaction was run in 8.0 mL neat rac-PO and the reaction time was 2 hours. Copolymer yield was 2.95 g. The f_(co2) was 0.25. The conversion of PO was 37%. TOF was 470. M_(n) was 3,000 g/mol. M_(w)/M_(n) was 7.1. No propylene carbonate was observed.

WORKING EXAMPLE VI Copolymerization Using Co[Ni(CN)4]

The procedure used in Working Example III was followed except the temperature of reaction was 70° C. Copolymer yield was 3.79 g. The f_(co2) was 0.3. The conversion of PO was 46%. TOF was 1170. M_(n) was 152,000 g/mol. M_(w)/M_(n) was 3.7. No propylene carbonate was observed.

WORKING EXAMPLE VII Copolymerization Using Co[Ni(CN)₄]

The procedure used in Working Example III was followed except the temperature of reaction was 50° C. Copolymer yield was 1.29 g. The f_(co2) was 0.36. The conversion of PO was 15%. TOF was 390. M_(n) was 163,000 g/mol. M_(w)/M_(n) was 5.8. No propylene carbonate was observed.

WORKING EXAMPLE VIII Copolymerization Using Co[Ni(CN)₄]

The procedure used in Working Example III was followed except the temperature of reaction was 30° C. and the reaction time was 5 days. Copolymer yield was 7.19 g. The f_(co2) was 0.56. The propylene oxide conversion was 76%. TOF was 16. M_(n) was 148,000 g/mol. M_(w)/M_(n) was 5.1. No propylene carbonate was observed.

WORKING EXAMPLE IX Copolymerization Using Co[Ni(CN)₄]

The procedure used in Working Example III was followed except the temperature of reaction was 70° C. and the CO₂ pressure after heating was 81.6 atm. Copolymer yield was 1.81 g. The f_(co2) was 0.38. The propylene oxide conversion was 21%. TOF was 540. M_(n) was 152,000 g/mol. M_(w)/M_(n) was 4.3. No propylene carbonate was observed.

WORKING EXAMPLE X Copolymerization Using Co[Ni(CN)₄]

The procedure used in Working Example III was followed except the temperature of reaction was 70° C. and the CO₂ pressure after heating was 68.0 atm. Copolymer yield was 2.57 g. The f_(co2) was 0.35. The propylene oxide conversion was 31%. TOF was 780. M_(n) was 233,000 g/mol. M_(w)/M_(n) was 4.8. No propylene carbonate was observed.

WORKING EXAMPLE XI Copolymerization Using Co[Ni(CN)₄]

The procedure used in Working Example III was followed except the temperature of reaction was 70° C. and the CO₂ pressure after heating was 40.8 atm. Copolymer yield was 3.92 g. The f_(co2) was 0.27. The propylene oxide conversion was 44%. TOF was 1250. M_(n) was 116,000 g/mol. M_(w)/M_(n) was 3.5. No propylene carbonate was observed.

WORKING EXAMPLE XII Copolymerization Using Co[Ni(CN)₄]

The procedure used in Working Example III was followed except the temperature of reaction was 70° C. and the CO₂ pressure after heating was 27.2 atm. The copolymer yield was 3.74 g. The f_(co2) was 0.23. The propylene oxide conversion was 48%. TOF was 1220. M_(n) was 111,000 g/mol. M_(w)/M_(n) was 2.6. No propylene carbonate was observed.

WORKING EXAMPLE XIII Copolymerization Using Co[Ni(CN)₄]

The procedure used in Working Example III was followed except the temperature of reaction was 70° C. and the CO₂ pressure after heating was 13.6 atm. The copolymer yield was 3.82 g. The f_(co2) was 0.16. The propylene oxide conversion was 51%. TOF was 1300. M_(n) was 222,000 g/mol. M_(w)/M_(n) was 3.8. No propylene carbonate was observed.

WORKING EXAMPLE XIV Copolymerization Using Co[Pd(CN)₄]

The procedure used in Working Example III was followed except the catalyst was anhydrous Co[Pd(CN)₄], the reaction temperature was 90° C. and the reaction time was 24 hours. The CO₂ pressure after heating was 54.4 atm. The copolymer yield was 1.47 g. The f_(co2) was 0.43. The propylene oxide conversion was 17%. TOF was 18. M_(n) was 25,600 g/mol. M_(w)/M_(n) was 3.6. No propylene carbonate was observed.

WORKING EXAMPLE XV Copolymerization Using Co[Pt(CN)₄]

The procedure used in Working Example III was followed except the catalyst was anhydrous Co[Pt(CN)₄], the reaction temperature was 90° C. and the reaction time was 24 hours. The CO₂ pressure after heating was 54.4 atm. The copolymer yield was 1.11 g. The f_(co2) was 0.44. The propylene oxide conversion was 13%. TOF was 13. M_(n) was 27,900 g/mol. M_(w)/M_(n) was 3.7. No propylene carbonate was observed.

WORKING EXAMPLE XVI Copolymerizations Using Co[Ni(CN)4} Made Using Various Cobalt Salts

Complexes were prepared as in Working Example I except that Co(NO₃)₂, Co(BF₄)₂, CoCl₂, and (CoSCN)₂ were used in place of CoSO₄. The prepared complexes were screened using the conditions of Working Example VI. Polymer masses obtained were 0.126 g of copolymer for Co(NO₃)₂, 0.765 g of copolymer for Co(BF₄), 0.563 g of copolymer for CoCl₂ and 0.305 g of copolymer for Co(SCN)₂. Based on these screens, the method to prepare Co[Ni(CN)₄] with highest activity was for catalyst prepared using CoSO₄.

WORKING EXAMPLE XVII Homopolymerization Using Co[Ni(CN)₄]

The procedure used in Working Example III was followed except no CO₂ was introduced and the temperature of reaction was 70° C. The CO₂ pressure after heating was 0 atm. The polymer yield was 5.19 g. The f_(co2) was zero. The propylene oxide conversion was 78%. TOF was 1990. M_(n) was 188,000 g/mol. M_(w)/M_(n) was 3.6.

WORKING EXAMPLE XVIII Homopolymerization Using Co[Ni(CN)₄]

A 100 mL Parr autoclave equipped with a mechanical stirrer is dried under vacuum at 80° C. for 2 h and then transferred to a drybox to cool to 22° C. Co[Ni(CN)₄] (10 mg, 0.045 mmol) is put into a glass sleeve in the autoclave. Toluene (8 mL) and PO (8 mL, 0.1 mol) is added under nitrogen via an injection port. The autoclave is then heated to 90° C. over 20 min. The total reaction time after initial heating is 1 h. The autoclave is cooled and vented to yield a large polymer mass, which is dissolved in CHCl₃ to ensure the same is homogeneous before taking an aliquot for ¹H NMR analysis. The solvent is removed by rotary evaporation and the resulting polymer is dried in vacuo at 50° C. to a constant weight to determine polymer yield (6.0 g, 91%). The resulting polymer is dissolved in toluene and treated with 10% aqueous NH₄OH (20 mL) to remove the catalyst and then dried in vacuo to a constant mass. M_(n) is greater than 80,000 g/mol. M_(w)/M_(n) is greater than 2.

WORKING EXAMPLE XIX Copolymerization of Epichlorohydrin and Carbon Dioxide

A 100 mL Parr autoclave equipped with a mechanical stirrer is dried under vacuum at 80° C. for 2 h and then transferred to a drybox to cool to 22° C. Co[Ni(CN)₄] (10 mg, 0.045 mmol) is put into a glass sleeve in the autoclave. Toluene (8 mL) and epichlorohydrin (R in (I) is —CH₂Cl) (8 mL, 0.10 mol) is added under nitrogen via an injection port. The autoclave is pressurized to 34.0 atm and then heated to 90° C. over 20 min. During this time the pressure increases to the desired 54.4 atm. The total reaction time after initial pressurizing is 24 h. The autoclave is cooled and vented to yield a polymer mass, which is dissolved in CHCl₃ to ensure the same was homogeneous before taking an aliquot for ¹H NMR analysis. The solvent is removed by rotary evaporation and the resulting polymer is dried in vacuo at 50° C. to a constant weight to determine polymer yield (1.1 g, 10%). The resulting polymer is dissolved in toluene and treated with 10% aqueous NH₄OH (20 mL) to remove the catalyst and then dried in vacuo to a constant mass. M_(n) is greater than 800 g/mol. M_(w)/M_(n) is greater than 2.

WORKING EXAMPLE XX Homopolymerization of Epichlorohydrin

A 100 mL Parr autoclave equipped with a mechanical stirrer is dried under vacuum at 80° C. for 2 h and then transferred to a drybox to cool to 22° C. Co[Ni(CN)₄] (10 mg, 0.045 mmol) is put into a glass sleeve in the autoclave. Toluene (8 mL) and epichlorohydrin (R in (I) is —CH₂Cl) (8 mL, 0.10 mol) is added under nitrogen via an injection port. The autoclave is then heated to 90° C. over 20 min. The total reaction time after initial heating is 24 h. The autoclave is cooled and vented to yield a polymer mass, which is dissolved in CHCl₃ to ensure the same was homogeneous before taking an aliquot for ¹H NMR analysis. The solvent is removed by rotary evaporation and the resulting polymer is dried in vacuo at 50° C. to a constant weight to determine polymer yield (1.8 g, 19%). The resulting polymer is dissolved in toluene and treated with 10% aqueous NH₄OH (20 mL) to remove the catalyst and then dried in vacuo to a constant mass. M_(n) is greater than 800 g/mol. M_(w)/M_(n) is greater than 2.

Variations

The foregoing description of the invention has been presented describing certain operable and preferred embodiments. It is not intended that the invention should be so limited since variations and modifications thereof will be obvious to those skilled in the art, all of which are within the spirit and scope of the invention. 

1-11. (canceled)
 12. A method of preparing Co[M(CN)₄] comprising reacting Co(SO₄) and K₂[M(CN)₄] to form hydrated Co[M(CN)₄] to produce anhydrous Co[M(CN)₄] where M is selected from the group consisting of Ni, Pt and Pd.
 13. A method of preparing anhydrous Co[Ni(CN)₄] comprising the step of dehydrating microcrystalline Co(H₂O)₂[Ni(CN)₄].4H₂O.
 14. Co[Pt(CN)₄].
 15. Co[Pd(CN)₄]. 16-17. (canceled) 